LandNNES discussion documents
LandNNES has produced a range of public discussion documents all of which are open access and available in terms of Creative Commons licenses. LandNNES is committed to open access publishing. All of our research and briefing documents are made available in terms of Creative Commons Licences. You are free to remix, tweak, and build upon our work non-commercially, as long as you credit LandNNES and the authors. We also require you license what you produce in the same manner.
Available for download
Harding, A and Del Grande, L. (2019) Developing a People centred Land Governance Monitoring System for South Africa. LandNNES discussion document
This report aims to provide a discussion document for how we would like to develop a South African Land Governance monitoring system. The document provides a basis for:
|
Kingwill, R (2019) Inclusive Land Administration in the context of People Centred Land Governance. LandNNES discussion document
LandNNES commissioned the formulation of a conceptual framework to set out a clear exposition of what we mean by Land Administration, why it matters and how it can be improved and adapted to meet the needs of all citizens, and not only the elites. The purpose of the document is to inform an advocacy strategy and appropriate policy response for strengthening Land Administration. The document also aims to start a process towards developing a common understanding of Land Administration to inform an appropriate and coherent response to the breakdown in Land Administration in South Africa. |
Manona, S. (2019) An overview of South Africa's land data ecosystem for a people centered land governance system. LandNNES discussion document
The document seeks to :
|
Manona, S (2019) Concept note for a national land observatory. LandNNES discussion document
This document is primarily intended for internal discussion purpose among LandNNES members, for the purposes of clarification of our own proposal for a national land observatory. Secondly, the other purpose of the document is for LandNNES to use as a basis for engagement with other stakeholders such as government, parastatals, business and labor. Thirdly, the purpose of the document is for LandNNES to use inengagement with parliamentarians of all political persuasions. |
Oettle, L. (2019) Reactions to Minister Didiza's 19 December Media briefing. LandNNES briefing document
On Thursday, 19 December 2019, Minister of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development Thoko Didiza briefed the media on government’s response to the recommendations of the Presidential Advisory Panel (PAP) on Land Reform and Agriculture.. This document provides a review of responses to the Minister's briefing and an assessment of potential ways forward |
Phuhlisani NPC (2019) Developing a People centred Land Governance Policy Framework: Towards a pro-poor programme built on equitable access to land. LandNNES discussion document
This discussion document sets the scene for the development of a South African Land Policy framework for the many - not the few. The document:
|
Mtero, F with Hornby, D and de Satge, R. (2020) The Structure and Dynamics of South Africa’s Food System - the COVID-19. LandNNES discussion document
This report aims to provide a brief review of the history of the SA food system and discuss the conditions that may be required to realise alternatives to the corporate food system. The aims of this report are threefold.
|
Oettle, L (2020) Food Security in the context of COVID-19 in South Africa: a Civil Society Perspective. LandNNES discussion document
This document examines how Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) in South Africa can contribute to ensuring food security for South Africans during the unprecedented crises presented by COVID-19. The document
|
Manona, S (2021) The implications of the 2021 Casac & Others v Ingonyama Trust & Others for South Africa’s land governance policy trajectories. LandNNES discussion document
This report examines some of the key specific and broader implications of the landmark ruling on a case that that was lodged by the Council for Advancement of South African Constitution (CASAC) and Rural Women’s Movement (RWM) against the Ingonyama Trust, Ingonyama Trust Board, and others handed down by the Pietermaritzburg High Court on the 11th June 2021. |